Ext: population excuse many _ rotten potatoes

Bo press: this article text in some perspective, I once had: a piece of cake, the more people, less per copy; the population the more bad management. I do not dwell too, this metaphor is dangerous is not appropriate, it presupposes some excuses and excuses, tolerance and conceal the essence of the problem: the creation of wealth is the person, the amount of wealth and the land area is not entirely the corresponding proportion. Whereas the management of the population, mainly how management problem, not a few people. In the "location" aunt Uncle Joe's blog to see this article reproduces the text on the 23-year-old young authors "Tiger", in addition to the clear width of his ideas, but also to support his arguments of those strong figures. ͬʱ�����ţ����䣬��������֪�Ͼ������ƣ��˿ڲ����ڶ�����: �ϻ���ij��������˵����ij��֮����������Ϊ�˿�̫�ࡣ I always feel like people are actually quite mentally, so I'll ask someone else, your logic what? other big surprise: "MOM, you know? do you think about it, there is only one bread, one can eat the food, but two eat eat half a can, of course, the more poor people!" he gave me the feeling is not the production of bread, but grow on trees, should be more wealth, the more he felt more people, social wealth also unchanged, that has the extra people is why can't there be wastrel? another way of saying: "1 personal tube 3 individual and 1 individual tube 300 individuals, you said what?" you see this silly B also used rhetorical, he speaks as if a Government and the Government of Japan as many in number. In fact, a country for every 25 people in a government official, I don't know how other countries, but a officials never even 25 individual tube not come unless his IQ is less than 25. These two statements back to the essence of the end is the same: the lack of civic sense. These people have never been unaware of this country's wealth is created by their own hand, often has the following argument: "mentally D white keeps you all these years"; "the motherland as one's mother". In fact did I pay taxes to support some silly B, but the Earth is to have the talent, what are the national State, in turn, becomes a human mother? as some would say "one person-one of the three, tube 300" such a thing, that's because in their subconscious, one country only one real managers, that is the emperor. One more difficult, the country down into pieces are not on the list? I have said, the more furious over there: "How dare you small motherland!" he said he was splitting, powers too many hard tube, really tough. It was also said to be "more people, capita, the fewer natural resources." In comparison, it must rely on the spectrum, seems quite reasonable, but you make horizontal comparison and found that it is not. Say that the population density per square kilometre, one 136 people in the world but also ranked # 54, preceded India 328, Japan 337, Belgium, the Netherlands 395 339, Korea, Taiwan 636 491. While the United States by population density of 30 people, world ranking 143, down there Venezuela 27 26 people in Laos, Sudan 16, Turkmenistan, Mongolia 1 17 people. A person representing a square kilometers, reach on 351? is also not a poor man. Some people say "a State-owned large nobody lived in the desert and steppe", as if the world of desert steppe were concentrated in the country, in fact, you get a three quarters of the land and cut off all the population is concentrated in the small block left, a country's population density or catch up with Taiwan. Also too cut enough? that the territory cut off 90% of a country's population density became 1360, big enough? number on the results of the Hong Kong, Singapore 6389 6317, as Macau per square kilometre is 17684, you just put a territory cut off 99%, or more than just people. Such a contrast down you will find that a country's prosperity level with a population density of simply doesn't matter, but a people's intuitive feel, a country's population seemed to really have no decent, but also seriously affect the daily life. For example, when you're new to the train and have a look at the stack of a compartment is some mollusks, one moment you do not feel the pressure root as a person's dignity. In fact, are not on the train, the station in the station out of sight at a glance, but then why do you think people lightMore, I didn't expect was the railway operations capacity is too low?, in a State of railway length while the so-called Asian first, third in the world, but in fact only a country of more than a little bit of neighbouring countries, India and India's land area is only one-third of China. United States by land area, with a relatively small population to a quarter of the length of the railway is one of three times. The removal of a country full of railway was given to a people, each person can only be assigned to 5.5 cm long, selling scrap iron is not worth a few dollars, nearly two hundred of the world ranking. A State Highway length even as India, however �� the world's 70% of the toll roads in the country. In fact, a government revenues as high as $ 5 trillion yuan, of which public consumption, fidgeting consumer, travel these "three" is going to consume 90 billion, and administrative expenses ratio up to 19% in the United States, United Kingdom 2 times by 4.5 times, Japan's 8 times. This is the official figures, the "layman can't read, experts don't know". A country's Government even slightly more frugal so little, medical, educational, which solved the problem of a country's Government even? clean so little, one people will buy House? "population on" is just an excuse for the Government, is the Government doing too bad, find such an excuse to shirk their responsibilities. The Arabs were poor, they said because of Israel. Koreans were poor, they said because the US sanctions against the emperor. So big a national, even if it is targeted, even food self-sufficiency do? obviously nonsense. A country is like that, then engage in a family planning, and family planning work and able to feed a person. 50 years ago, a country with a population of only 6 billion, so there are fewer total enough �� results SB spur of the moment, it is still not starved to death by 5%. Transfer from: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4b9a56010100dygl.html (Uncle Joe of Antiquities)